Tag Archives: Voting

The Year of “The Angry Voter” and the Future of the G.O.P.

As Election Day approaches, American voters are not in a good mood. More than 64% agree that the nation is heading in the wrong direction. On the economy, consumer confidence is consistently at one of its lowest points in years, unemployment continues to rise, and more than ever before, Americans are finally believing the issue of our nation’s debt is at a crisis level.

As a result, the Party which controls every legislative chamber of federal government is now facing one of the most abrupt falls from political power that we have ever seen. In 2008, Democrats rode a wave of change. Creating that wave was Barack Obama, a new presence in politics who convincingly argued that with him at the helm, he would lead Democrats in “transforming America”. From Berlin, Germany to Bayonne, New Jersey, Senator Obama traveled the globe and the nation and painted a picture of a new and improved America, an America that was loved by all the world and that lifted the quality of all our lives. He promised to provide us all with better healthcare, financial wealth, inexpensive, cleaner energy, the best education and a less partisan political atmosphere that would unite us rather than divide us.

Instead what they got was not just the opposite, it was so antithetical to that promise that people are not just angry, they are offended.

Instead of real bipartisanship, the nation has seen the major issues of the day turned into  an audaciously corrupt and intensely partisan process that closed it doors to any differences of opinion. Instead of financial wealth, they have seen less business growth, less jobs, increased federal spending, higher prices, economic uncertainty and by year‘s end, record tax increases. And in the case of healthcare instead of seeing any meaningful reforms, they have seen it turned into a government bureaucracy that is raising costs more than lowering them. In fact, on virtually every signature issue of President Obama and the Democrat Congress, such as stimulus spending, the healthcare law and the bailouts, most voters oppose reelecting anyone who supported them.

In general, Democrats have done nothing to instill confidence in their leadership and vision for America. In fact, it is just the opposite and it happens to be their ‘signature’ issues, their top priorities, which have produced not only a lack of confidence in them, but a backlash of anger against them.

The healthcare bill, and the way in which Democrats rammed it through, highlighted all that Americans hate about politics and all that they feel is wrong with how business is done in Washington, D.C.. It was a process that revealed how the bills they vote on, go unread and how it closed the door to the Republicans, and even went so far as to shut down opposing views by asking Americans to report to the names and sources behind arguments which refuted the Democrat’s position on the issue. They asked that such dissention be reported to them at flag@whitehouse.gov, an assault on freedom eerily similar to that of the German National Socialist Party as it began to takeover Germany.

The process also highlighted numerous backroom deals that bought the votes of wavering Democrats at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars each. And in perhaps what was one of the most astonishing shows of just out of touch Democrats are, they spent an entire year focusing on ramming through their unpopular government takeover of healthcare, at a time when the economy was the top issue on the minds of Americans.

Today, the economy is still the top issue in the minds of most, but as demonstrated by their focus on healthcare reform, the White House and Democrat led Congress, nproved themselves to be out of touch and ineffective on. But even more than that, the one solution that they consistently offer to solve our economic troubles is turning out to be a another problem of its own which they fail face up to…… spending.

To every issue, their solution is spending. But spending has now gotten so obviously out of control that average Americans who understands that 2 plus 2 equals 4, have become offended by this liberal mentality that hopes people will believe that more money out of their pockets will allow government to put more money into their pockets. This offensive notion has only been compounded by the Democrat approach to all issues and problems which also calls for more government.

People are waking up to the realization that more government costs more money. They understand that a healthcare bill which creates over 127 new government agencies, department and bureaus does little to drive down healthcare costs and much to, among other things, increase costs.

Combined with that fact that the exaggerated growth of government and government spending is doing nothing to improve the economy and in fact is doing just the opposite, what you have is a new voter demographic. It is not a demographic identified by race, religion, or geographic region. It is not a demographic identified by age, or life conditions. It can’t be described as “Soccer Moms”, “Reagan Democrats” or “Yuppies”. It is a demographic that crosses all divides and unites a profoundly large portion of the electorate in 2012. It is the demographic of “Angry Voters”.

In the Republican Revolution of 1994, credit for the political turnaround of that time was credited to what pundits penned as “Angry White Men”. They claimed that white men were fed up and felt threatened by the rise of women and minorities in society and took it out on democrats. These pundits were as wrong then as those who try to play the race card anytime President Obama must face legitimate criticism today. In ‘94, the revolt away from Democrats largely began when President Clinton gave First Lady Hillary Clinton the responsibility for reforming healthcare with a plan that would have government take it over. That move did not suddenly unite white men again Democrats and it did not motivate African-Americans to come out and support them. It had nothing to with sex or color and everything to do with federal overreach.

Fast forward 16 years and history is repeating itself.

In 2010 Americans are seeing a dramatically exaggerated display of government largess which is leading to a government that is growing too much, spending too much, controlling too much and failing too much. It is the failings and the overreach of Democrats which is what is behind the Republican Rejuvenation of 2010. In 2008, politicos and the left wing of American politics touted the demise of the G.O.P.. Some political prognosticators claimed that the Republican Party was dead for a generation or more. Others claimed it had gone the way of the Whigs. As usual, they were wrong. But this is not to the credit of Republicans. The Republican bounce back has less to do with them and everything to do with Democrats.

Democrats have so offended the senses of rational thought in mainstream America, that the average person has become “angry”. So much so that even those who care little for Republicans, are willingly holding their noses to vote the Republican ticket, simply to register their disgust with government and the Democrats controlling it. And all of these people have become the “Angry Voter” demographic that is about to undo the liberal overreach of the past 20 months which has simply highlighted and brought to the forefront, all that Americans see wrong with government.

I would suggest that I could be wrong, but if I were, Republicans would not be preferred over Democrats by 48% to 39% of likely voters, a dramatic turnaround from 2008. If I was wrong, voters would not be trusting Republicans more than Democrats on 8 out of 10 key issues. If I was wrong, 78% of mainstream voters would not be claiming that they prefer fewer services and lower taxes.

If I was wrong. West Virginia’s overwhelmingly popular Democrat Governor would be far ahead of his Republican opponent in the race replace the late Robert Byrd in the Senate. However, despite the fact that voters in West Virginia love Governor Manchin, they are skeptical of sending another Democrat to Washington, D.C., where the last thing they want is to provide additional support to take the nation in the wrong direction that they feel Democrats are leading us in.

Americans are fed up. They feel hoodwinked by a President who promised to unite us but has only successful polarized us. They feel swindled by a Congress that promised a healthcare bill that would lower costs, but is already raising premiums. They feel swindled by a government that is taking more freedoms away than they are protecting. They feel betrayed by a federal government that will sue a sovereign American state in order to allow the free flow of illegal immigration in America. They are angered by a White House that promised to not conduct business as usual, only to demonstrate that they are conducting business worse than usual.

These are the reasons why Democrats are losing voters since 2008. It is why more voters are again beginning to identify themselves as Republicans than as Democrats. It is also why many Democrats are not even coming out to vote and why Democrats are on scheduled to suffer some of the most significant losses in decades. 20 months after promising the world to voters and inspiring and motivating millions of young and first time voters to the polls, Democrats under Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama, have not only disappointed them, they have embarrassed them and successfully discouraged those new voters from showing their support for Democrats again in 2010. And what’s more is, they have so alienated so many, that new group of young and first time voters are now inspired to come out to vote against them.

In 2008, Republicans presented little reason to vote for them and in many cases, were already seeing the signs of disenchantment from their own base of support. But now, in 2010, although Republicans have done little to change that, Democrats have successfully embarrassed their own base, turned disenchantment into downright anger and chased voters back into the arms of the Republican Party. From here on out it will be up to the G.O.P. to prove that they have gotten the message which they strayed away from and cost them dearly in 2008. If they fail to, I predict that a third Party will begin to rise.

From the TEA movement, arguably, the most influential political force of the last year, we will see an independent ideological division of voters significant enough to not merely influence the selection of candidates in the primary elections of both major Parties, but one so potent and so disgusted with the failure of both major Parties, that it will naturally rise to the forefront. Ultimately, this would be to the benefit of the Democrat Party, for this new breed of anger voters is united behind principles which are largely encompassed by the Republican Party but seemingly ignored by the political establishment of the Party.

These angry voters are beholden not to any Party. They are ruled by a commitment to the Constitution and three core achievements ……. less government, less spending and, more liberty. By the very nature of today’s contemporary Democrat Party, those goals contradict with the liberal faith in an activist government which seeks to regulate more, provide more services, oversee more, and spend more to do so. For that reason, if Republicans fail to represent the total opposite of what Democrats offer, this new breed of angry of voters is far too fed up to reverse the current trend, jump back to Democrats and put them back in power. Instead they will continue to reject the modern Democrat Party, turn their back on the G.O.P. once and for all, draw votes away from them and make it possible for the smaller number of left leaning supporters to build up a coalition of enough votes to compromise slim electoral victories for Democrats in local, state and national, three way elections.

For this reason, it is with trepidation that I look forward to November 2nd. I fear that the G.O.P. may not fully be ready to lead as it should. Thanks to Democrats, the Republican Rejuvenation of 2010 is coming to the the G.O.P. leadership  far too easily. I fear that the wrong leadership in the Republican Party will take this victory for granted. If they do, Democrats and the liberal ideology that most Americans do not agree with or have faith in, will once again be advanced much too far for their liking. If Republicans fail to adhere to a hard-line on states rights, a constitutional limited government, limited spending and a social agenda that does not invade privacy and individual rights, they may not go the way of the Whigs, but they could find themselves enduring many years of hard fought elections that produce the same type of electoral success that John McCain saw in 2008.

Leave a comment

Filed under politics

Democrat Controlled Board of Elections Sticks it to “Whitey”?

Picture of Rich Whitney, Green Party candidate...
Illinois Green Party Candidate for Governor Rich Whitney, aka: Rich Whitey
Bookmark and Share    File this under “Screwed”

In Illinois, Rich Whitney is running for Governor as the Green Party candidate.

Now by any standard, running only on the Green Party line makes getting elected hard enough….no offense…..but it’s true. There ain’t a whole hell of a lot elected Green Party members holding office.

But thanks to the Illinois Board of Elections, underdog Whitney’s uphill battle has been twice as tough.

An error, or at least what officials are calling an error, has placed the name Rich Whitey on the electronic voting machines of 23 wards. To make matters worse, most of these 23 wards are predominantly African-American districts.

Officials say that there is no way to fix the error but now claim that 90% of the voters effected by this error will receive paper ballots with Rich Whitney’s name spelled correctly.

Human error is most likely the culprit here. Stupidity does run rampant among government agencies packed with politically appointed patronage positions. But it is really ironic that this particular mistake occurred in a very tight race for Governor, where a few hundred votes could easily make the difference . And having the Green Party candidate, a candidate that could attract liberal votes away from the Democrats line, described as a “Rich Whitey”, sure helps to insure that some black voters avoid voting for the Green Party and cast their ballot for the Democrat candidate.

No matter what though, the Democrat Board of Election of Illinois sure as hell stuck it to “Whitey” …err…Whitney.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a comment

Filed under politics

Intentional Incompetence Disenfranchises Military Voters

Bookmark and Share    It was recently disclosed that New York State had not mailed out absentee ballots to its 320,000 military servicemen and women and overseas voters. The failure to do so puts New York in clear violation of the MOVE Act. But New York is not the only state denying our service members the right to vote. A number of Democrat leaning counties in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Indiana, New Mexico, and Nevada have also failed to comply with the MOVE Act which requires states send out their military and overseas ballots 45 days prior to elections.

The situation reveals a number of political injustices that strike a direct blow at democracy in America and highlight the entrenched abuse and indifference that has become commonplace in politics. Disenfranchising voters is one of the most egregious acts of any democracy and it is especially damning when the very men and women who are at this very moment risking life and limb as they fight the American cause on foreign fields of battle, are the ones being effected. These are the people who are defending democracy, yet they are the same ones being denied the opportunity to participate in one of its most intrinsic rituals.

The situation becomes even more offensive once you understand that the reason for this denial of the most basic right to vote, stems from a mix of both intentional and incompetent political decisions. The total collapse of the system as it pertains to guaranteeing that our military’s vote be counted, is something that can not be ignored. In fact it is just the opposite——–it must be actively defended.

Yet states like New York, have failed to insure that its active duty military members have a say in their government.

It would be bad enough if that was just the result of incompetence. If that were the case, it would be tragic and another example of just how inefficient government is. But if incompetence on the part of local and state election agencies was the only problem here, the situation could be none the more intolerable, but at least believable. However, if incompetence alone was the reason that states failed to send military ballots out in a timely manner, why then was it not caught by the federal Department of Justice?

The DOJ has entire divisions which are charged with insuring that our laws, including election laws are adhered to. They have entire divisions which are suppose to be monitoring the process and insuring that things like the MOVE Act are being abided by.

Yet here we are, little more than 20 days away from Election Day 2010 and many states are still in violation of the MOVE Act.

Are we actually expected to believe that incompetence on every level of government ranging from county, state and federal agencies was the sole reason for the complete breakdown of the system that would allow our military to have their ballots counted? Or could it be that intentional oversights of a partisan nature chose to allow timelines and deadlines to pass so that military ballots would quietly be ignored and left out of the final certified results of some of the more close elections that are being held?

It is no secret that military ballots usually break in favor of Republicans. That factor could have figured in to the violation of the MOVE Act by several Democrat led states and counties. In a state like New York, while statewide races like those of it two senate elections and its gubernatorial race, military ballots are not likely to sway the results towards the G.O.P.. But in New York, there are several close races for the House which could be determined by a handful of votes.

The same is the case in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Indiana, New Mexico, and Nevada.  And in Connecticut and Nevada, like many House races in those states, the statewide race between Linda McMahon and Democrat Richard Blumenthal and Sharon Angle and Harry Reid is close enough to be decided by a few extra votes………maybe by military votes……..the military votes that will now not be counted in the final results.

Perhaps that is why the Obama Justice Department failed to detect any problems. Perhaps that is also why the DOJ still has not filed a suit that would help correct this clear violation of federal voting rights.

It is quite hard to believe that so many different levels of government which are controlled by Democrats all simply became incapable of doing their job at the same time, involving the same group of voters. It is also hard to believe that Democrats have not said a peep about this most horrendous violation of American citizenship.

Instead of actually insuring that government works, people like President Obama have been trying to accuse those out of government of sabotaging America. Instead of a war time President showing some anger over the nerve that there are those whom would deny our warriors their right to vote, President Obama is trying to accuse the United States Chamber of Commerce of laundering foreign money to sabotage his policies. But what of his Administrations willingness to let the mandate of the people be sabotaged by intentional incompetence? Instead of trying to heat up racial tensions and accuse Republicans of wanting African-Americans to stay home on November 2nd, why isn’t the Commander-in Chief trying to insure that his troops are guaranteed a voice in the way our nation is governed and by whom it is governed?

But the cover-up goes even deeper than the political regimes that are temporarily and very tentatively controlling government. The left leaning, drive-by media is also participating. The field of journalism, both broadcast and print journalism is one that is suppose to be noble. According to the Society of Professional Journalists;

“….public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility.”

Yet today we are in a news cycle and mentality that is more focused on whether or not Christine O’Donnell is an actual, true to life, cauldron stirring witch, but few headlines blare the bold headlines which contain the words “Government Disenfranchises Military Voters and Does Nothing About It”.

The media is just as guilty a participant in the game of political driven, intentional incompetence as those who are responsible for it in government. The media could take a stand that states, be this done by Republicans or Democrats, it is wrong, intolerable and in need of an immediate resolution that guarantees the votes of our fighting men and women are counted before any votes are certified by any local, state or federal boards of elections.

As Americans, unless we all take a stand and do something, each one of us are just as complicit in this tragic injustice as are those responsible for allowing it to happen and those unwilling to give it the coverage and importance that it deserves. We must all send a note to our representatives and a letter-to-the-editor to our media outlets and our local weekly and major daily newspapers. We must all let it be known that we find it unforgivable that our government is willing to have our men and women take a bullet for democracy but refuses to take their votes into consideration when it concerns our democracy.

Bookmark and Share

 

<!–911c00d7c9824b11af88fd4a24d714d8–>

1 Comment

Filed under politics