Tag Archives: national sovereignty

Declaration of Principles and Proposed Policies

by Michael Duminiak

Bookmark and Share    In response to to the current direction of the government in Washington, I offer the following declaration of sound principles and proposed policies to truly address the issues facing our nation.

Our government was created to be unique in the world. Power came from the people, not from the government or from nobility. Sovereignty was split between a central government and State governments. Powers of government were split between executive, legislative and judicial branches.

The national government was entrusted with the exclusive management of our foreign affairs. Beyond that it was given a few general enumerated powers. All others were reserved to the States or the people. The national government has no rightful authority to force reform on the States. It leaves the people, under its protecting influence, entirely free to improve their lives by the legitimate exercise of all their mental and physical powers. Such a system secures the general happiness, prosperity, and advancement of our country: which come from liberty, not from power. Every effort was made to keep a concentration of power from accumulating. Our founders knew that concentrations of power are a threat to liberty.

In the course of our existence under the Constitution, we have only seen fit to amend it twenty-seven times. Ten of those were the Bill of Rights at the very beginning, leaving only seventeen amendments in over 200 years. In that time, we grew from a weak and relatively poor nation into a world power. Then, we began turning our backs on the principles that made us what we were.

While the judicial branch had been interpreting the Constitution since Marbury v. Madison in 1803, it did so within the confines of whether a specific law violated the express powers delineated in the Constitution. In more recent times, the judiciary has begun creating new powers for the central government that were not expressly granted to it. It has, through those actions violated the 9th and 10th amendments by stealing from the States and the people powers and rights they reserved for themselves.

In so doing, our government has become an obese, inefficient, expensive overlord that bullies its citizens and extorts its member States. Granted, it was with the best of intentions that the scope of the national government was expanded without Constitutional amendment, but as the adage goes, “The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.” What was done for the best of ends was done by the worst of means and has, over time, become the exact opposite of that which it was intended.

Rather than the government of limited powers in which the people retained strong liberty that we experienced for around 150 years, we have evolved into a government of strong powers in which the people retain limited liberty. The programs designed to lift people up have become the weight that holds them down through taxation and debt. The safeguards of national security have become the chains of the enslavement of liberty.

It should be our primary objective to administer the government in the true spirit of the Constitution and not to assume any powers not expressly granted or clearly implied in its terms. Our government is one of delegated and limited powers, and it is by a strict adherence to the clearly granted powers and by abstaining from the exercise of doubtful or unauthorized implied powers that we can safely maintain liberty and prosperity in our country. To that end, need a President who will use all the powers of the office to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. One that will veto any and all bills sent to him that contain anything that is unconstitutional and who will send those bills back to the Congress specifically detailing the Constitutional objection. In that manner, the Congress can be encouraged to keep within due bounds and only pass necessary and proper legislation.

It is exactly the passage of unnecessary and improper legislation that has virtually enslaved the citizens of this country. Benjamin Franklin wrote, “It would be thought a hard government that should tax its people one tenth part.” Yet today, the average tax paid is 1/3rd of income up from 1/20th a century ago. Some might say that as the cost of necessary government functions increased with inflation, the tax rate needed to go up. That is not true. As the cost of necessary government functions increased with inflation, so did the income of the tax payer and therefore no increase in the tax rate should have been necessary. All those increases in the tax rate from an average of 5% in 1910 to the average of 32% today come from the expansion of government beyond its proper bounds.

In fact, nearly 60% of the increase in the rate of taxation came AFTER the end of the Great Depression. The great expanding of government to combat that national calamity less than doubled the tax rate from pre-Depression levels, while the monstrous growth of government since then has tripled it. Worst of all, the relatively massive level of taxation doesn’t even cover the bill rung up by this government.

I propose a massive restructuring of the tax system to break us free from the waste and manipulation of the tax code, while also reducing the tax burden on the American people. I propose the adoption of a flat tax rate on individuals and businesses as a transitional step towards adopting the Fair Tax plan. It would exempt individual gross earnings up to 2 times the established poverty level and tax all income above that level. Likewise, business gross earnings up to the value resulting from multiplying the number of legal US resident employees in the business against 2 times the established poverty level would be exempt from taxation with all gross income above that level taxed at the specified rate. This system would allow all people to cover their living expenses tax free while also saving some money.

I propose an exemption on Individual Retirement Accounts up to but not to exceed the greater of 10% of gross annual income or 25% of the annual median income, allowing all to save but keeping the wealthy from unduly sheltering their income. Further, I propose a sliding scale system in which corporations or businesses that voluntarily use eco-friendly means of production which exceed EPA standards are weighted to match credits or rebates up to a 10% reduction of the total tax due from annual gross revenue.

We must also make sure that Social Security benefits are exempt from taxation as well as inheritances and that there be a complete exemption from income tax for spouses of military personnel deployed in a theater of battle to be effective from the time of deployment to the end of the calendar year after deployment ends. These citizens should not be taxed into poverty.

Finally, we must end the manipulation of the tax code to benefit one special interest or another by requiring a 2/3 majority for passage and adoption of any change in the flat tax rate, extending or eliminating tax credits, increasing or decreasing the rate of a penalty tax, creating any new penalty taxes, borrowing money to pay for general expenses.

Spending is out of control and even taking the current 1/3 of the people’s income can’t keep pace with it. Instead, this government has borrowed vast amounts of money. The U.S. public debt is over $10.8 trillion. If you count the amount of money owed to cover promised benefits from social programs, the debt is really over $65 trillion. Our debt is nearly 3/4 of our GDP! So, we tax 1/3 and we borrowed 3/4. In short, our government spending is completely out of control.

This outrageous condition is not entirely due to the expansion of the size of government. It is partly the fault of false budgeting and government corruption. Our budgets and estimates never reflect reality. Programs always cost more than the budget predicts. Whole major categories of foreseen expenses are left out of the general budget and then tacked on as supplemental appropriations and emergency expenditures. The result is that a budget already out of balance is thrown completely into a tailspin of overspending, but in a way that keeps it out of sight of the people.

Further kept in the shadows is the corruption within our government. Many members of Congress wear ‘for sale’ signs around their necks. They sell their votes for pork barrel projects and funding earmarks, raising both the expense of government and increasing its size. These special projects would never pass in the light of day on their own merits. They are bad legislation, tucked into bills with which they have nothing in common in order to buy a vote. It is disgraceful and every member of Congress who has engaged in this practice should be charged with corruption and locked in a federal penitentiary. But, that won’t happen because it is those same members of Congress who police themselves. The system of checks and balances devised by our Founders has been gutted, allowing a so-called legal form of corruption to bankrupt our nation. For that we should be ashamed.

All across our country, there are people who barely scrape by; people who live in poverty, people who suffer and people who live in despair. To help them, the government created a mass of social programs. Yet, for all the mountains of money poured into these programs, the poor, the suffering and the despairing remain locked in their misery. The burden of the expense of these programs has weakened our economy, forced the reduction of employer sponsored benefits, increased the tax burden on the people, reduced their ability to save and thus made them increasingly dependent upon government. They have, for all intents and purposes, been enslaved by the government that was supposed to keep them free.

Such is the result of the vast expanse of government into social programs that are neither expressly permitted nor even strongly implied by the Constitution. We have robbed the people of their wealth and their liberty in order that they might be compelled to support programs that are unnecessary, ineffective and unconstitutional. These programs, if done at all, should be done at the State level where they could be tailored to the needs of the people instead of shoe-horned on as a one-size-fits-none national approach.

It is time that these programs be reformed and transitioned either to the States or to the people through private enterprise. Only through that necessary action can the Constitution be faithfully restored, the expense and debt of the government brought back into line and the security of the people to their property and their liberty be maintained.

In this effort to reform and transition those programs, we must also look at other national government programs, agencies and departments that are either unnecessary, unconstitutional or just plain redundant. Our Constitution calls for a census of the people every decade, yet we pay for and maintain a massive census bureau at all times. There is no need for that. The province of education is a State power, yet we have a massive Department of Education that uses its power and tax-payer money to coerce not only States, but even individual schools to dance to its tune. That is unconstitutional and wrong. The U.S. Geological Survey and the EPA overlap in many areas of what they do, resulting in increased cost to the taxpayer without any increased benefit. That should be corrected. These are just a few examples of the vast number of programs, agencies, and departments that need to be reformed or eliminated.

This waste extends into the management of the public lands. Ownership of vast tracts of land is against the very nature of our government. Lands not used for the public at large should be turned over to the States in which they reside to be used or sold for the advantage of the people. The government is not supposed to be a landlord nor is it supposed to be a resource hog.

The protection of our national parks and forests should be made a priority, rather than the leasing of lands to some which truly belong to the people. The bloated nature of our government has pushed to the edges some very critical objects, leaving them under-funded and generally neglected. Our national parks and forests are two of those critical objects that must be given more consideration and attention by this government. They are great resources for the people and the nation and should not be neglected.

It is also important not to neglect the security and economic viability of our ports. Just recently, the government almost got away with seeing our strategic ports sold off to a foreign power. What manner of insanity infects this government that so important a resource would be handed over to a foreign power? Thankfully that dangerous idea was stopped, but our ports remain unsafe. Much needs to be done to ensure security at our ports so that they do not become the gateways of our destruction. Likewise, we must review our laws and regulations of the ports so that the government is not destroying our economic viability. Burdensome laws and restrictions that make the cost of doing business too high to encourage strong economic growth should be repealed or revised so that the aims of security, both domestic and financial, are realized.

Just as our national parks and forests and our ports are major resources for the wealth and prosperity of the nation, so too are our mineral and fuel resources. The balancing of the benefits of extracting and using those resources with the protection of our shared environment must be a top priority of government. While it is not the right of the national government to interfere in the operation of businesses directly, the regulation of interstate commerce and our routes of commerce gives the national government the authority to protect the people from the abuses of businesses. Such authority, however, should be used with a vision towards progress and building a better world, rather than simply as a punitive measure. We should be encouraging businesses to both prosper and see the value of protecting the environment. Ultimately, we all (businesses included) pay the cost of pollution, if not in our health – at least in our pockets from which the money is taken to pay the costs of clean-up.

We all have an obligation to protect and defend this nation. That extends to our resources and our environment. Just as we should not pass a burdensome debt onto future generations, we should not leave them an environmental mess to deal with. We can all take personal responsibility for making this a better world for our children and grandchildren. Through conservation, reducing waste and increasing efficiency as individuals, we can have a massive collective impact.

Yet, managing our own personal usage is not enough. The time has long since come for us, as a people and as a nation, to deal with the energy crisis that pollutes our environment, causes instability in our foreign relations and weakens our economy. We must implement a national energy strategy that promotes environmentally responsible domestic energy production, fosters a climate of conservation, stimulates economic competitiveness and encourages innovation.
We can increase our environmentally responsible domestic energy production through several means. We can reduce the of use of foreign oil by expanding the use of Wind, Solar and Hydro power; increasing our domestic refining capability and efficiency; deploying smaller and source centered nuclear plants and managing emissions of by-products such as gases and waste. Coupled with conservation by increasing energy efficiency, reducing individual commuting and doing a better job of energy production and consumption balancing, we can become both energy independent and environmentally sound.

This can be done without hurting our economy, but actually enhancing our economic competitiveness. We can grow our economy by becoming leaders in alternative energy production technology, transitioning the job market towards these new skilled areas rather than continue domestic layoffs in favor of foreign supplies and by reducing production and operation costs by lowering the cost of energy and increasing efficiency. This can be accomplished and maintained through innovation: from pushing forward research and development to expanding consumer involvement by following a strategy of market focused product design. Lastly we can use government purchasing to drive development. There is no excuse for government to tell the people to be more energy efficient while it wallows in massive inefficiency itself. The government sets the specifications of the things it purchases and should specify those so that the demand for energy efficient and alternative energy products drives the supply.

As we consider our economy, it is not enough that the nation is wealthy. If the people are comparatively poor, national wealth is meaningless. Already we have looked at how excessive taxation, out of control spending and the massive size and weight of government have served to enslave the people. These have acted not only on the people, but also on the economy. Higher paying jobs have been lost and replaced by low-paying positions. Even these have been driven to artificial lows by the scourge of illegal immigration.

The argument that there are jobs that American citizens won’t do does not hold water. If American citizens could be paid under the table, paying no taxes and yet getting all manner of benefits, they would accept a lower wage. In the end, the take home pay is actually better for many illegal workers than low-income legal workers. By allowing and actually encouraging this deflation of wages by excusing and ignoring the problem of illegal immigration and illegal employment, this government is directly responsible for the economic hardships of its citizens.

The government must act to end this national threat. To that end, I propose comprehensive immigration and border security reform. We must secure our borders. I propose that we stop delaying legislation already in place and construct a double tiered security fence along the entire border with Mexico, including monitored entry points tied with immigration processing facilities and enhanced with electronic monitoring and alarm equipment to detect breaches and crossings.

We must also create an Executive Review Panel that updates and revamps immigration laws, their enforcement and the process to gain citizenship. This should be coupled with diplomatic efforts to encourage reform in Mexico as well as to cooperate with State and local government police agencies to catch and identify illegal aliens. Any illegal aliens or legal immigrants not yet citizens convicted of a felony or misdemeanor offense must be immediately deported either as or following the sentence ordered by the courts, without exception; any appeals to be filed from outside the US after deportment. We cannot allow the continued lawlessness and gang violence brought by many of these illegal aliens.

Further, we must hold businesses accountable for their part in this illegal immigration crisis. I propose that any business or private employer who fails to properly follow IRS requirements for establishing citizenship status and legal status to work within the United States for their employees shall be subject to a fine of not less than 10% of their total gross income per offense.

Lastly, we should pass legislation stating that English is the official language of the government of the United States of America and no agency, department or officer thereof is required to issue public documents, signs or statements in any other language. This type of legislation would allow us to continue the current system of voluntarily providing multi-lingual materials to the people, but would prevent the disastrous costs of the government ever being forced to provide everything, everywhere in every language that might be spoken. Such a protection is necessary to the financial and social security of the nation.

Our security does not stop at the border. In truth, our security is best maintained by the actions we take in the world. It is through those actions that the likelihood of physical, economic and social security is founded. Likewise, the greatest threats to our way of life beyond the damage we do to ourselves, come from the failure to act appropriately in international affairs.

We have seen the consequences of that failure many times. We have seen when failure to act at all endangered us. We have seen where taking too gross an action created problems for us. We have seen where failing to see an action through to completion weakened our security and prosperity. The management of foreign affairs was specifically delegated to the national government because there must be consistency in its application and it must be driven not for the advantage of individual interests, but for the whole people.

It is from that perspective that the drive away from protective tariffs towards free trade was instituted. On a level playing field, free trade is the optimal method to benefit all people. However, the playing field is far from level. Many foreign nations have almost no labor or environmental laws or those laws are able to be circumvented with enough money. In some nations, the government artificially lowers the cost of production through subsidies. Even we engage in that form of rigging the market. The effect of these actions is that the playing field is anything but level.

That is why I propose a shift in our trade policies away from strict free trade towards a reciprocal system otherwise known as fair trade. This system balances out the actions of other nations with equal actions on our part so that the playing field becomes level and a free market drives production and consumption rather than the policies of foreign nations. As foreign nations reduce their interference in the production of goods and impose upon their manufacturers the same labor and environmental expenses we pass on to ours, our trade with them will shift ever closer to absolute free trade.

This is important because the current free trade agreements are not really free market policies. They do not benefit the populace as a whole as much as they benefit certain interests and foreign powers who manipulate the price of goods to their benefit. Our trade laws should be designed to benefit the populace at large and a fair trade system best accomplishes that goal.

The same holds true for foreign aid. Such aid must be given not simply to meet a media highlighted crisis, but for the purpose of building both a strong positive relationship with other peoples and to secure the safety and prosperity of the United States. Aid that accomplishes little more than maintaining a problem or that falls into the hands of those who created the problem does us more harm than it does good. Oppressive regimes cannot be toppled when the people are helped into submission by negating the evils of their government through providing aid. Such actions only reward and help entrench evil making its ultimately inevitable removal that much more difficult. Economic and social aid to nations that are not on the right track just prolongs suffering and creates aggressive threats not only from the existing governments but also from revolutionary governments who view the actions of the United States as having been collusion with the former oppressive regime.

It must be our policy only to provide aid to those who are making positive progress. Only by that means are we really helping and building a more secure world. In the cases of nations where oppression calls for action, then let us act rather than simply throw fuel on the fire in the form of aid that props up failure.

In taking action in the world, we have the right to act for our own best interests. Let no one disparage us for taking action ourselves when action is necessary and concert with other nations would cause dangerous delay. Yet, let us strive to work with allies, both time-honored and newly made in solving problems we have in common. The more of the world that is involved in correcting a problem, the more of the world that will stay involved in making sure the success gained is not lost over time. Most importantly, when we have committed to action, we must see it through to completion. If we are failing in our approach, then we should change the approach, not abandon the goal. Overall failure is not an option.

It is also time for the actions we take around the world to stop being used as political footballs. Our military and our foreign policy are not fair game for partisan manipulation. Such actions hurt all Americans and weaken us economically, socially and militarily. We must return to treating our foreign policy and our military with the gravity and long-term vision with which it used to be handled.

I propose a repeal of the War Powers Act. While the intent of that act was to restrain the President’s ability to wage indefinite and undeclared wars, the result of that act has been the institutionalization of indefinite and undeclared wars. They have become legitimized as well as politicized through this redefinition of the war making power. Congress must concur in order to fund the action, but Congress is not held liable for the action and therefore it has a tendency to politicize the effort. Further, this type of conflict results in a hazy interpretation of the rules of war and escapes the necessity for a formal treaty ending hostilities. Without such, there is no guarantee of maintaining any gains made and the legislative branch gets no input in the outcome of a war paid for and consented to by them.

Wars should be declared by Congress as prescribed by the Constitution. Congress would then be vested in the effort and held accountable to support its needs until a formal conclusion. That formal conclusion would be in the form of a treaty to be ratified by the Senate as prescribed in the Constitution. By that appropriate means, the legislature both initiates and concludes war, with the President conducting the war. Such a policy brought us stability and security in most of the world. It was abandoning this policy in modern times that has resulted in the ceaseless conflict we find ourselves in today. Even when we gain victory, we lack the long-term stabilizing force of treaty to maintain it. Instead we find ourselves re-fighting supposedly beaten foes. In this manner, we weaken ourselves in the face of the world and do a disservice to our military.

Our military is not designed to be nor should it be serving as the police force for the world. It is designed to be used to fight and win, not police. We waste it by spreading it out around the world in places it is not needed and then call up our strategic reserves and even our National Guard to fight its wars. Those best prepared, trained and equipped to fight and win are sitting at installations in Europe and Japan while the support reserves are dragged from their jobs and dumped onto the front line. That is no way to administer the military.

I propose the immediate redeployment of all active duty military personnel from Europe and Japan either to active combat zones or domestic military installations. The war in Europe and Japan has been over for more than sixty years and the Cold War has been over for more than a decade. The time has come to bring those troops home. Doing so will not only prevent the diplomatic incidents that have arisen from time to time that build resentment against us, but also strengthen our economy by putting all that spending here rather than in foreign economies.

I further propose that legislation be passed making the National Guard a solely domestic force used to defend our borders, respond to attacks within the country and to be used domestically in times of emergency. Additionally, military reserves should not be sent into active combat zones until all regular duty units have already been sent. The reserves should be held in reserve should we need them, not expended like regular military. Such misuse discourages enlistment and hurts our economy by taking employees away from jobs for extended periods to do the work we are already paying our regular military to do.

Finally, I call on the Congress to fully fund our military and provide their complete benefits. A nation that treats its men and women in uniform like second class citizens is a nation that does not value its security. I also call on the leaders of the military to focus on the future and work towards developing technology to meet those needs and for the Congress to follow those recommendations rather than simply order weapons that are or are becoming obsolete simply to prop up various industries. We must not make the same mistakes that preceded each of the world wars that left us weak in the face of superior weaponry because we refused to develop new technology and spent our military budget on building obsolete equipment.

Our standing in the world is based on the strength and quality of our military, its just and successful use, the manner in which we treat other nations and governments, the vigor of our economy, our standard of living and most importantly the degree to which we maintain liberty and freedom for ourselves. I therefore call on the Congress, all the members of government and the people to return to respecting the Constitution, the limits it sets and the manner in which it directs us to act.

If we take those steps and focus on maintaining liberty and security as well as maintaining strength, we will have no reason to fear for the future. No matter what changes in the world may come, a nation that is truly built upon the consent and power of the people will not only survive, but thrive. It is only when we curtail liberty so that government does for the people the things they ought to do for themselves that we create a house of cards. Any emergency or disaster would have the ability to completely paralyze our nation if it continues to rely on government for its daily existence. A people dependent on their government for the necessities of life are not a free people. That is not the American way. We have done better and we can do better. That is what I am committed seeing done and I ask you all to please join with me. Together we can make a difference.

Thank you.


Bookmark and ShareThis post was written by Michael Duminiak.

Mike is a defender of freedom who cherishes our nations’s potential and the constitution that founded our government.

After recently winning the Republican nomination, he is running for Mayor of Pennsylvania’s Port Matilda

POLITICS 24/7  is proud to have the chance to publish his work and honored to introduce him as our newest POLITICS 24/7 blogger

1 Comment

Filed under politics


With the new year here, we have the opportunity to reflect on the year gone by and to thank the passage of time for resolving some situations. While some happenings in 2008 came and went, other events of 2008 still require time, time that will absorb much of 2009 and even beyond.

So today, before we forge ahead with the rest of this new year, we reflect on the events that shaped politics and the politics that shaped events, by presenting to you the 10 most significant political stories of the year that helped to get us where we are today.






Both of these men loved politics. For a time they were both involved in politics on different sides of the aisle and during  a different time they covered both sides of the aisle in politics . Tony Snow started in print and broadcast journalism delivering political news and commentary and ended his career in politics as the Press Secretary for President Bush. Tim Russert began in politics working for a political legend, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York and ended covering politics on NBC. As host of Meet The Press, Tim became a part of every American household and despite his personal left leaning tendencies Tim Russert was respected for probing questions that were leveled at liberals and conservatives alike. Tony Snow was also a partisan. For decades he was a favorite in conservative circles, yet when delivering a news story people of every party carefully listened to the insightful delivery of facts that he presented. His last major endeavor was one that helped provide the White House with the ability to properly convey the right messages. Tony served as Press Secretary for 17 months. Probably the most understandable 17 months of the Presidents two terms in office. Tim Russert died after suffering a massive heart attack on Jun 13th at the age of 58 and Tony Snow died after battling colon cancer on July 12th at the age of 53. In life they shaped politics and political opinion. In death, they left us a legacy of lessons and examples to follow.







The Empire State helped to set a tone for 2008 when early in the year, New York’s Governor, Elliot Spitzer got caught up in scandal. After serving only 14 months in office the rising Democrat star found himself standing next to his wife announcing his resignation. Suspicious transfers of money in and out of Spitzer’s bank account led federal investigators to believe that he might be taking bribes. However their probe discovered that for over several years Spitzer wasn’t taking bribes, he was paying out at least $80,000 for prostitutes. The period covered his tenure as New York’s Attorney General as well as his brief time as Governor. The happiest people of all in this episode were David Paterson and New Jersey. As Spitzer’s Lieutenant Governor, Paterson, became New York’s first African American Governor, and the nation’s first legally blind one. New Jersey was just happy to know that they were no longer the only state in the region to lose a governor because of sexual scandals and illegal conduct.




NOT WANTED but is he dead or alive?

NOT WANTED but is he dead or alive?


Around August rumors began to circulate that North Korea’s obscure and, to put it kindly, eccentric leader, Kim Jong-Il, was dead. Since then no reputable sources have either seen him or heard from him. Not that that is unusual, few people have ever heard or seen Kim Jong-Il, but what is unusual are recent decisions that Kim Jong-Il supposedly made to eliminate efforts to develop nuclear power. Did Kim make that decision? Is North Korea really abandoning nuclear ambitions? Or is North Korea propping up Kim Jong-Il, like a bad, out of sync, Korean version of “Weekend At Bernie’s” while a different, unknown, brain dead ruler is pulling the strings and, at the same time, trying to pull the wool over our eyes? All jokes aside, the sensitivity of the situation is a dire one. Chaos on the Korean Peninsula could create a ripple effect that no one can afford. Dramatic events could alter sensitive relations with South Korea and negotiations with the United States. All of which could result in tensions throughout the world including those involving hard feelings between North Korea and Japan. And let us not forget North Korea’s greatest ally, China. With their booming economy, the Chinese are ambitious. Knowing who is in charge of things could be helpful in 2009.







In 1959 Cuba took on the face of Fidel Castro. Just 90 miles off of our shores, Cuban communism and Castro were too close for comfort. As much as we didn’t like it, invasions, coups and even assassination attempts did not eliminate Castro’s hold on power. However, time did reduce Castro’s influence. As time changed most of the world, Castro and Cuba didn’t but the logistics which helped to make him a thorn in our side did change. The, once feared communist Soviet-Cuban relationship lost it’s potency as the Soviet Union lost it’s hammer and sickle. As time went by, our concerns with Cuba focused more on human rights for Cubans than defense from Cuba. So it was still welcome news when, in February, we discovered that an ailing Fidel Castro was resigning from office. Not that it mattered much. Before stepping down, Fidel told the Cuban Communist Party that they were too elect his brother Raul to be the new Commander in Chief. The event did not change things very much but after almost 50 years in power, and events such as the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Elian Gonzales and other disconcerting situations, as minor as the effects of this change may be, Fidel’s painstakingly slow departure from the world stage is welcomed and ranks as the seventh most dramatic political occurrence of 2008.





It was not a battle that reshaped Europe again but the surprising developments that caused the Russian Army to invade a neighboring, breakaway Republic with internationally recognized sovereignty, gave us all a glimpse of reality. It may not be the Soviet Union anymore but a bear by any other name is still a bear and the vulnerabilities of newly formed and reformed European nations and those with relatively new freedoms still offer some new Russian leaders the same old reasons for wanting control. The incident helped to demonstrate that freedom in parts of Europe is still a fragile concept.



ROD "How much do 'ya want" BLAGOJEVICH

ROD "How much do 'ya want" BLAGOJEVICH



2008 ended with a story that will carry well into the first months of 2009. As President-Elect Obama vacated his seat in the U.S. Senate, Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich began a private auction process to determine who will fill the vacancy. As investigators, under the direction of federal prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, investigated Blagojevich for numerous improprieties, they discovered that he was basing his appointment to the senate seat on who could give him the most for it. Blago wanted either a “cushy union” job, a high paying cabinet position or at the very least an enormous financial campaign contribution. After being arrested the Illinois state legislature began impeachment proceedings against Blagojevich and he began digging in his heals refusing to resign. The events have the potential for drawing in some big name co-conspirators and participants. From Rep. Jesse Jackson, jr. to President -Elect Obama’s incoming Chief of Staff, Illinois Rep. Rahm Emanuelle, many reputations may yet be questioned in this scandal. And to make things even more interesting, Blagojevich took the opportunity to raise the stakes and named Roland Burris, a long time, old line, liberal Chicago Democrat party machine hack to replace Barack Obama. Not at all concerned with peoples faith in government, or the integrity of the process, Burriss accepted the tainted appointment and in doing so, puts the United States and it’s Democrat leader, Harry Reid in the position of denying to seat someone that would be the only African American in the United States Senate. So coming in as the fifth top political occurrence in 2008 is the story that will keep on bleeding and keep us reading…..the process to replace a Barack Obama in the senate.







One of the most important political decisions made in 2008 was John McCain’s selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President on the Republican ticket. It was a controversial choice for some and one of the only right decisions made in the opinions of others. No matter how you see it, it remains one of the most spoken about political stories of the year. Beyond the newsworthiness are the implications. For many it was a sign of the fact that government needs thinking that is as far removed from the Washington D.C. mentality as Alaska is from Washington D.C itself. Many Americans are tired of Washington politics and want common sense as opposed to the one hand washes the other, old boys bureaucracy that we perceive as screwing us more than helping us. Sarah Palin embodied, and still does embody, that thinking. She is a political outsider who became a Governor by opposing the political class while representing the working class. Without abandoning conservative Republican principles, Sarah Palin fought against corrupt Republican and liberal politicians. Although picking Sarah Palin for Vice President may have been the right decision for John McCain, trying to restrict and control her wasn’t. By trying to script Sarah Palin, the McCain campaign lost out on the greatest advantageous quality Palin brought to the ticket…….her anti-establishment, outsider qualities. As McCain lost the election for President, Sarh Palin won exposure. Exposure that has made her a person who conservatives look forward to advancing the cause and for Americans to have to consider for national leadership in the future. So at number four in 2008 is the selection of Sarah Palin for Vice President. Thank you senator McCain!



ant1oil23. – “OILS WELL” IN THE ECONOMY?


The price of oil ranks third on our list of top stories. As prices for a barrel of oil soared to heights in excess of 150 dollars a barrel , gas prices flew up to over 4 dollars a gallon and the ripple effects raise the cost of everything from milk, eggs and bread to lumber, air fares, and life in general. The high cost of energy generated heated debates over domestic oil drilling, and pushed issues like immigration and terrorism off of the front burners in the race for President. Based upon the duration of the immediate negative effects of the price of oil combined with its ripple effects on the economy, its control of the political agenda and the long term policy initiatives that it created, oil prices is number 3 in ‘08. It is also likely to become a top story again, at least around August of ‘09, when the now delightfully low prices we see rise back up.







Putting all political opinion aside, Barack Obama ran a long hard campaign, that Republican strategists are dissecting in order to reproduce in elections of their own. The Obama campaign not only effectively tapped into voter dissatisfaction, they organized it and organized it well. Their utilization of the internet was exemplary and their ability to win favor through eloquence and style over substance and fact was done to political perfection. Despite some pitfalls such as Bill Ayers, ACORN, Rev. Wright, admitting a desire akin to socialism by stating that he wanted to spread the wealth, Barack Obama won big. To do so his campaign raised historic amounts of money and more than just raising that money, they spent it right and put it to good use. A use that mobilized the forces well enough to produce his substantial victory. The election of President-Elect Barack Obama comes in second not only because of how he won but because he did win. His victory marked the election of America’s first African American President. Like any other first, it is notable and in this case it is profoundly notable. It demonstrates an undeniable ability for our nation to overcome racial differences and the evidence of decency overcoming prejudice is promising. The effects of President-Elect Obama’s leadership are yet to be seen but the lessons learned and points made by his election are unquestionable.



ant1bailout21 . – BAIL OUT MANIA


POLITICS 24/7 considers the 700 billion dollar bailout that the federal government approved to be the most profound and important story of 2009. Not only was the suggested need for this bailout indicative of our wrong ways of the past, it signaled a continuation of wrong ways in the future. Our promotion of spending as the answer to all of our problems has created generations ands a government that spend beyond our means. The 700 billion dollar bailout meant to solve our problems didn’t solve our anything, it just provided a quick fix. It did however, create more problems. It has called upon more people and more industries to put their own hands out. The bailout set in motion a sense of government control that has taken freedom, with all of it’s risks and promises, out of the free market and it has helped to move America closer to the socialism that we have fought against in the past. Many major events come and go in politics. What we once saw as earth shattering developments often become something that we later laugh about but we fear that bailout trend established in 2008 is no laughing matter for any time.


2008 was an intense year. There were many events and some of the most dramatic ones did not involve politics. Human nature played a role in all of them though and hopefully our better instincts will drive the events and politics of 2009.

With that in mind we wish everyone a happy new year and hope that our better instincts help to make each and every day better than the last.


Leave a comment

Filed under politics