Tag Archives: acorn

Fearful Jersey Democrats Start Campaigning For Chris Daggett

Bookmark and Share    In one of the most corrupt states in the Union, sleazy politics should come as no surprise to


Frightened Jersey Democrats Trying To Steal Votes......Again!

anyone.  But when an incumbent Governor and his state party stoop down to sleazy tactics in the closing hours of an election, you know they’re losing it———-figuratively and literally.

PolitickerNJ.com, the state’ s premier political blogging web site informs us that the New Jersey State democrat Committee is making robo-calls into heavily Republicans districts.  The calls are urging New Jersey republicans to vote for Independent candidate Chris Daggett.

Most of these calls are going into heavily Republican Morris and Somerset counties.  The tactic is geared at suppressing Chris Christie’s Republican.

As Election Day progresses, turnout in Republican districts is described as steady to heavy.  That’s good for Christie, bad for Corzine.  But in heavily African-American and Democratic Newark, the state’s largest city, voter turnout is lower than hoped for.  That too is good for Christie, bad for Corzine.

Given the circumstances, a call begging New Jerseyans to vote for Daggett is probably the last thing Corzine

Stolen Absentee Ballots 1

Fraudulent Absentee Ballots Discovered. Where is ACORN today?

 Democrats can do.  They know full well that they can’t convince most people to vote Corzine!  To counter this the Christie campaign has  robocalls of their own reminding to watch out for Democrats trying to “trick you into voting   for Chris Daggett“.

It looks like the race for Governor in New Jersey will not be as close as polls show.  I believe Christie may even win by more than the 3% POLITICS 24/7 predicted earlier.

No wonder why the Democrat State Committee is dumping money into campaigning for someone other than Corzine,their nominee.  Democrats are beginning to see the writing on the wall and it scares them to death. 

But wait!

This just in.  There’s word that thousands of fraudulent absentee ballots have been found.   Hmmmm, I wonder who might be trying to stiff those ballots?  Anyone know what ACORN is up to today?

Leave a comment

Filed under politics

Senate Moves To Strip Funding To ACORN as the Nut Begins To Crack

Bookmark and Share    In the wake of ACORN employees being caught aiding undercover clients in trafficking ObamaAcornAyers1underage girls into prostitution and explaining how to cheat on their taxes without getting caught, POLITICS 24/7 called for the following five measures:
  1. 1.-President Obama must denounce ACORN for their own irresponsible hiring and regulations and training practices.

2.-Congress must halt all access to federal funding that is available to ACORN

3.-Employees of ACORN who have been caught conducting illegal acts and fraudulent activity of any kind must be punished to the fullest extent of the law. No excuses!

4.-ACORN must immediately lose any and all charitable status accreditations that it may have.

5.-Tighter federal regulations of private and not for profit groups that utilize or appropriate any federal tax dollars must be tightened and any expenditures must be approved by a bipartisan government board. If the federal government is to dole out dollars to not for private, private groups, regardless of how much longer and complicated the process may become, the need for tighter regulations regarding abuse of the use of those dollars has been made quite evident.


Republican Senator Mike Johanns

This week Senator Mike Johanns (R-NE) introduced an amendment to an appropriation bill that will strip ACORN of all its funding.

Under normal circumstances, despite a history of unethical and questionable legal activity Democrats would normally not even consider eliminating funding of the liberal front group. In fact they are prone to finding more ways to fund them with more money every chance they get.

But with the recent high profile examples of blatant illegal conduct that involved ACORN offices in Baltimore, Washington, D.C. and Brooklyn New York, Johanns amendment was something that Democrats had a hard time resisting without being held accountable for going along with the aiding and abetting of prostitution, human trafficking and tax evasion.

Even so, they did try to resist at first and a few actually did. Six Democrats initially voted down the amendment and as the roll call continued a few more added their support for ACORN and voted against stripping them of federal funding. But as the vote continued, it became clear that majority of Democrats were supporting the amendment as they voted in favor of it. As the trend turned against ACORN, New Mexico’s Tom Udall, Wisconsin’s Herb Kohl and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey who voted against the amendment earlier changed their vote and went with the flow.

In the end, Johanns’ amendment passed by a vote of 83 to 7.

The seven Democrats that refused to strip ACORN of its funding and instead chose to continue supporting the pimping out of underage girls for sex and trafficking children in to sex slavery were:

Roland Burris (D-IL)

Dick Durbin (D-IL)

Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)

Patrick Leahy (D-VT)

Bernie Sanders (I-VT)

Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)

Robert Casey (D-PA)

Between ACORN’s longstanding corruption in the area of Democrat voter registration fraud, partisan political electioneering and now this most recent scandal, while the seven pro-corruption Democrats have no excuse for their vote, the final decision of the senate was more than justifiable, it was necessary. But the amendment still has a long way to go.

In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi is an ACORN nut and so are many of her liberal colleagues who rely heavily on the partisan political activity that ACORN conducts within their districts during election time. Here, the amendment to cease federal funding to ACORN will have an uphill battle. Of course due to the groups indefensible and consistent hiring of people who abuse the funding that they receive, a vote against the amendment will assuredly become an election that will weigh heavily around their necks. So, like their counterparts in the Senate,

House Democrats may not want to run with this hot potato either.

In the meantime while the Brooklyn District Attorney investigates the Brooklyn offices of ACORN, The Census Bureau has severed their ties with group. That is a devastating blow to the liberal establishment which relies heavily on ACORN’s history of double counting and making up people in Democrat districts so that the once every decade redistricting process favors Democrats.

But the final nutcracker to crush ACORN might just come if California Congressman Darrell Issa has his way and the group losses its nonprofit 501(c)(3) tax status.

Given ACORN’s partisan political activity, removing their status as a charitable organization is only fitting. According to Issa’s office, a probe of that matter may be in the works.

To date, it would seem like most all of the actions that I proposed last week are taking place. All except for one. The one that calls upon President Obama to distance himself from his friends at ACORN and to denounce them. So far, the President’s silence on the matter is deafening.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a comment

Filed under politics


Bookmark and Share   BigGovernment.com breaks a story that further demonstrates the abuses of the already established to be abusive, liberal front group ACORN that President Obama once help train when he was an attorney for them.

acorn2According to undercover investigation, ACORN employees, aided a woman who posed as a prostitute trying smuggle underage kids into the country that were to be used for the establishment of a brothel.

Not only did the ACORN employees not stand in objection to the intended illegal behavior, they offered assistance in how to make it successful.

As seen on tape produced by BigGovernment.com, the ACORN employees explained how the woman could get tax credits for the underage children she was trafficking, how she could avoid getting caught by the IRS for cheating on her taxes and how to keep peace between her and her pimp.

This is what the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now really stands for?

Is that what a collective amount of billions in federal funding has and is being used for? Do we really want the government to fund the illegal trafficking of little girls into a life of prostitution with taxpayers dollars?

Officials at ACORN may once again claim that this is a set up and that it involves only their employees, not theirACORN3 organization. That may be the position they take but there comes a point in time when rampant corruption among a groups employees must be considered an inherent part of the group that hires these people and maintains a longstanding history of corruption on their umbrella.



We did not find the prevalent fraud committed by ACORN during the ‘08 election “bad” enough to shut them down. But if prostitution and evasion of the law and IRS is not enough, than there are a whole lot of elected people in America that need to be impeached. But only after ACORN is SHUT DOWN!!!!!

Bookmark and Share

1 Comment

Filed under politics


In the Islamic faith a madrasa is a school for the study of the Koran and Islamic thought,. Many madrasas are wrongfully used to teach extremist Islamic views and indoctrinate the young into jihad against what they call, the great Satan, the United States.

When used as a training ground for terrorism, madrasas are dangerous. They perpetuate a corrupted interpretation of a religion and breed violence and hatred all in the name of Allah.

Such schools of propaganda are frowned upon and not only discouraged but fought against. Yet here in the United States a growing number of political madrasas are cropping up in the gymnasiums and classrooms of our own public schools. They have grown in number from California to New York and were inspired by followers of liberal messiah Barack Obama.

Liberals have been blinded by hatred for Republicans and motivated by their jealousy of Republican electoral victories.  That same hatred and jealousy has inspired them to spread their message through the basic educational institutions within the nation’s school systems.

Just a few weeks ago a college level teacher forced students to complete an assignment that ripped apart Sarah Palin’s speech at the Republican National Convention. A contrary approach that would have supported her speech by a student, who agreed with what she said, was unacceptable and did not fulfill the requirements of the assignment.

Shortly after that, low grade elementary school children were gathered together for days of rehearsal as they prepared for a choir performance that sang the virtues of Barack Obama.

Now in Missouri, another teacher was reprimanded for gathering students together for pro-Obama military like drills that shout out adoring chants for Barack. As you can see in the video, it is an eerie display of Nazi like military celebrations for Hitler.

In fact all of these public school activities and the training of children into liberal ideologies before thay have developed sense of personal independent thought are frightening. The biased indoctrination of youth by public school educators is appalling. The single digit aged kids singing in choirs for Obama is reminiscent of communist Chinese school auditoriums paying homage to Mao Tse Tung.

What I find most intriguing is the fact that the educators who are sponsoring these events are the very same people who refuse school prayer or the pledge of allegiance to be conducted in the public domain. They have thrown the ROTC off of campuses and refused to allow it as an option for children.  Yet they are more than happy to train school children to believe that Barack Obama is our savior and that he is the one person we must have faith in.

It is another example of liberal hypocrisy and a prime example of the same type of madrasa-like atmosphere that extremists use to brainwash children and draft them into jihad.

The problem, for me, is that this is still America. The Islamic jihad has not yet converted our population to their cause and the tactics that they use should not be adopted by American schools and educators. It is bad enough that many institutions of higher learning are dominated by liberal radicals like domestic terrorist and Obama buddy Bill Ayers who is now a Chicago professor. But the line must be drawn in our elementary institutions.

Liberals preach the virtues of tolerance and acceptance. They accuse all others who are not liberal of being

Class In Session At An Extremist Madrasa

Class In Session At An Extremist Madrasa

intolerant and prejudiced yet they have no qualms about brainwashing innocent children into promoting their own biases and intolerances. Just like the extremist madrasas promoting their sheep-like flock of terrorists.

All of this is a result of the very real messiah image that Obama has created for himself. An image that he, himself, believes and that his mindless, desperate, bitter, hateful followers agree with. For them Obama can do no wrong even though he has done nothing in his entire political career. For them winning is all that matters and for them no one is immune from their tactics to win, not even innocent children. It is dangerously similar to the bombing tactics of William Ayers or Hezbollah and it is unacceptable in a democracy, especially our American democracy.

It is time for Barack Obama to denounce such tactics and help to stem the prostituting of our youth in an attempt to promote a political agenda. Does he adore and endorse endorses these tactics the same way that Kruschev did when children from all over the former Soviet Union were collected and gathered in Red Square to sing his praises behind a backdrop of the latest military hardware? Or does Barack rejects such spectacles and tactics as an illegitimate and inappropriate parasitizing of children for political purposes? Having the messianic complex that he has of himself I think I know the answer to that question.


Here is a free puppy

Barack Obama is running down the street one day, and he sees a little girl who is giving away puppies that her dog just had.

He goes up to the girl and says, “Little girl, I think that it’s wonderful that you’re doing such a good thing.”

The little girl says, “Thank you, Senator Obama. Would you like a puppy? They’re Democrats.”

Barack declines and jogs onward. The next day Barrack jogs past the same girl and decides to talk to her again. “You know what, little girl? I think I’ll take one of those puppies after all, seeing as how they’re Democrats.”

The girl says, “I’m sorry Senator Obama, but they’re not Democrats any more. They’re Republican now.”

Barack says, “They are? How do you know? As a matter of fact, how did you know that they were Democrats at first to begin with?” 

She says, “Well, just after they were born they were Democrats, but now their eyes are open.”



Filed under politics


Eric Rudolph was convicted to life in prison after murdering people and bombing two abortion clinics. Had his despicable crimes not killed people in those bombings and he served a lesser sentence he may well be out of prison someday. But what if Eric Rudolph had he not been kept behind bars?
To extrapolate on this scenario, let us say that he was released from prison because his bombings did not kill people and he chose to pursue a peaceful means of protesting abortions. Let us say he created a political action committee and this Pac donated $1,000.00 to Sarah Palin in her race for Governor of Alaska. If such a scenario existed I would be among the first to say that Sarah Palin’s lack of judgment in accepting that donation, precludes her from being a deserving choice for Vice President. I would detest her blatant ignoring of Eric Rudolph’s past intentions and suggest that by accepting this, hypothetical donation, she is either consciously or subconsciously condoning those past actions. I would suggest that such a tie to Eric Rudolph is inappropriate and has no place in legitimate political conduct.
Thankfully, such an example is not the case. When sentenced the judge presiding over the case compared Rudolph to Ku Klux Klansmen who, in 1963 bombed a Birmingham church and killed four black girls. It was an appropriate comparison and the punishment Rudolph received was well deserved. In fact, it is my belief that the death sentence was in order but, irrespective of my reprehension for his conduct, Eric Rudolph received two life in prison sentences and will never have the chance to use violence to try to further his cause again.

I would also point out, that Governor Sarah Palin would have the judgment to reject the type of donation that I outline and she has the instincts to not just reject that donation but she also has the judgment and morals to never enter into an entanglement or participate in partnership on any effort with the likes of individuals who would carry out violent forms of protest or terrorist activities.The statement was motivated by Obama’s association, friendship and fundraising efforts with William Ayers who in the late sixties formed the Weather Underground, a group of radicals teamed up with the Black Panthers to violently confront the US government. They started with street riots and escalated to bombing government targets.

However, if this example or a similar one, were to be true, the word crucifixion comes to mind. The left would be pounding the nails into Palin’s palms. The fact that she did not condone Eric Rudolph’s tactics or extremist views would still not quell the outcry against her. The fact would be that if Palin joined with Rudolph in any social or political cause, it would be seen as condoning the actions of Rudolph’s past. Nancy Pelosi would be calling her a murderer, Joe Biden would be falling allover the stage as he tried to equate her imaginary ties to Eric Rudolph as akin to the relationship between Hitler and Mussolini. Even Republicans would be denouncing Sarah Palin and distancing themselves from her. All of them, the left and the right, would be correct in their denunciations..

If this hypothetical example were true, the attacks would be endless and ruthless and they would indeed make Palin an implausible contender for elected office.

Yet, during the last few days, Sarah Palin has become a target of leftwing, hate mongers for stating that Barack Obama’s ties to a domestic terrorist, calls into question Obama’s judgment and qualifications.

In the time following Ayers’ active participation as a domestic terrorists, he served time in prison. Since then he has become a devout radical, campus academic and professor of education at the University of Illinois In this capacity his stated educational objective is to “teach against oppression” as embodied in “America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation”. As a part of this mission William Ayers founded a “school reform organization” called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC).
Oddly enough, Ayers appointed Barack Obama to chair the CAC and even more reprehensible, Barack Obama accepted.

Obama chose to ignore William Ayers past conduct and today he even tries to excuse it away. He does so despite the fact that his buddy Bill Ayers has even written and profited from a book about his terrorism. In Fugitive Days, page after page is laced with Ayers rationale for the over 30 bombings conducted by the Weather Underground. He legitimizes them and stands behind them. He even reflects on whether or not he might use bombs against the U.S. in the future and goes as far as writing “I can’t imagine entirely dismissing the possibility,”.

Despite this unrepentant attitude, Obama maintained his active involvement with Ayers on the CAC and was instrumental in obtaining $600,000.00 for the group.

Barack Obama’s partnership with Ayers and his terrorist past don’t stop there. Records show that the CAC granted money to far-leftist causes, such as the radical Association of Community Organizers fro reform , or ACORN, which …has done work on behalf of Obama’s presidential campaign.”. That essentially amounts to an illegal funneling of money and illegal campaign contribution.

Additionally, in 1995, Ayers and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, a fellow terrorist who attempted to bomb soldiers in Fort Dix when she was a fellow comrade in the Weather Underground, held a fundraiser for Barrack Obama in one of his first campaigns for state elected office in Illinois.

To all this, Obama distances himself from Ayers by claiming buddy Bill is “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood,”. Obama tries to further distance himself from the terrorism of his buddy Bill by explaining that Ayers’ bombings occurred when Barack was just a little boy.

All this, and more, are examples of what Sarah Palin broached in her remarks that conjured up great angst within the ranks of the left, the Obama camp and terrorist sympathizers.

She is right. Sarah Palin is perfectly justified in raising questions about Obama’s judgment in regards to the terrorist activities of his buddy Bill Ayers. It is appropriate to call into question Obama’s partnership with such a person. Just as appropriate as Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Biden and fellow Republicans would be in denouncing Sarah Palin if she had a relationship with Eric Rudolph and the abhorrent bombing of .abortion clinics. The only difference is that liberals are hypocrites. They will attack one side for being wrong but never acknowledge wrongs when they exist on their own side.

If Sarah Palin conspired with terrorists, raised campaign funds with them and funneled money into their activities, she would not be running for President, yet Barack Obama does and the left is angry that it is even questioned.

I think the left better get a grip. They better begin to find all forms of terrorism unacceptable and not condone or tolerate any ties to it. They better let go of their double standards and accept the fact that wrongdoing is wrong, even when their own liberal messiahs participate in it.


1. -You have to be against capital punishment, but support abortion on demand.
2. -You have to believe that businesses create oppression and governments create prosperity.
3.- You have to believe that guns in the hands of law-abiding Americans are more of a threat than U.S. nuclear weapons technology in the hands of Chinese and North Korean communists.
4. -You have to believe that there was no art before Federal funding.
5. -You have to believe that global temperatures are less affected by cyclical documented changes in the earth’s climate and more affected by soccer moms driving SUV’s.
6. -You have to believe that the AIDS virus is spread by a lack of federal funding.
7. -You have to believe that the same teacher who can’t teach 4th-graders how to read is somehow qualified to teach those same kids about sex.
8. -You have to believe that hunters don’t care about nature, but urban activists who have never been outside of San Francisco do.
9. -You have to believe that having self-esteem is more important than actually doing something to earn it.
10.-You have to believe that taxes are too low, but ATM fees are too high.
11.-You have to believe that standardized tests are racist, but racial quotas and set-asides are not.
12.-You have to believe that Hillary Clinton is normal and is a very nice person.
13.-You have to believe that the only reason socialism hasn’t worked anywhere it’s been tried is because the right people haven’t been in charge.
14.-You have to believe that homosexual parades displaying drag, transvestites, and bestiality should be constitutionally protected, and manger scenes at Christmas should be illegal.
15.-You have to believe that illegal Democratic Party funding by the Chinese government is somehow in the best interest to the United States.

Leave a comment

Filed under politics